The article delves into a comprehensive exploration of the existing regulatory landscape concerning the rights of defense for commercial legal entities accused in Vietnam. By thoroughly analyzing the current Vietnam penal procedure law provisions on the right to self-defense and seeking legal counsel for accused commercial legal entities, the article sheds light on the legal framework's intricacies in this context. This scrutiny is vital in ensuring that the fundamental principles of justice and fairness are upheld in the legal proceedings of such cases. By engaging in an in-depth analysis of the legal framework, the authors aim to gain a deeper understanding of the practical implications of these laws within the context of real-world legal proceedings. Through this approach, the article strives to provide a holistic understanding of the challenges and opportunities that arise when protecting the rights of these entities facing criminal accusations. The authors employ a comparative methodology to bolster their findings, evaluating the rights of defense for charged individuals and commercial legal entities. By juxtaposing the rights afforded to individuals facing charges with those granted to commercial legal entities, the article identifies potential limitations within the current legal provisions. This approach helps highlight any disparities or gaps in legal protection, providing a foundation for advocating for more robust legal safeguards for commercial legal entities accused of criminal conduct.

             Building upon their insightful analysis, the authors offer practical solutions tailored to address the unique challenges commercial legal entities face in the legal landscape. These solutions encompass a spectrum of legal and procedural enhancements, all aimed at ensuring the protection of commercial legal entities' legitimate rights and interests, thereby establishing a more balanced and equitable legal environment for all parties involved in criminal legal proceedings. Crucially, the proposed solutions serve to protect the rights of commercial legal entities and maintain the fairness and integrity of the entire legal process. By strengthening the rights of defense for these entities, the authors contend that the overall fairness of case settlements can be improved. The article emphasizes that a just and well-balanced legal system is crucial for maintaining public trust in the criminal justice system.

In conclusion, the article's exploration of the regulations concerning the rights of defense for commercial legal entities accused in Vietnam is a timely and significant endeavor that addresses a crucial aspect of the legal system. Through a meticulous analysis of the existing legal provisions, a comparative assessment to uncover potential limitations, and the presentation of practical solutions, the authors contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding the enhancement of legal safeguards for commercial legal entities. This ensures the protection of their rights and plays a pivotal role in maintaining the credibility and fairness of the broader criminal case settlement process. By advocating for these improvements, the authors underscore their commitment to fostering a legal environment where justice, fairness, and equitable treatment are paramount.