Đăng nhập
 
Tìm kiếm nâng cao
 
Tên bài báo
Tác giả
Năm xuất bản
Tóm tắt
Lĩnh vực
Phân loại
Số tạp chí
 

Bản tin định kỳ
Báo cáo thường niên
Tạp chí khoa học ĐHCT
Tạp chí tiếng anh ĐHCT
Tạp chí trong nước
Tạp chí quốc tế
Kỷ yếu HN trong nước
Kỷ yếu HN quốc tế
Book chapter
Tạp chí quốc tế 2019
Số tạp chí 24(4):19(2019) Trang: 1-21
Tạp chí: Journal of Ecology and Society

ABSTRACT. The  resilience  concept  has  provided  a  new insight  and  approach to  the  conventional perspective  of  agricultural management by emphasizing the need to maintain a diversity of future options to adapt to inevitable and often unpredictable changes. The concept has been taken up by various academic disciplines and development sectors, yet ways to define and operationalize resilience as a measurable  concept  are still being developed.  We contributed to this ongoing  effort  by implementing  a subjective  resilience assessment method  based on farmers’ perceptions  of three resilience components: (1) the sensitivity of their agricultural systems to increased salinity intrusion, (2) the capacity to recover from salinity damage, and (3) the capacity to change to other systems if salinity increases in the future. We conducted  27 in-depth interviews with local and national authorities, 11 focus group discussions, and 118 semistructured and 219 structured interviews with farmers in case study villages located along salinity transects  in the Mekong Delta and at different distances to sea dikes in the Red River Delta in Vietnam in 2015-2016. Results from the subjective resilience assessment reveal that none of the agricultural systems studied systematically scored higher than the other systems on all three resilience components, implying that  an increase in one resilience component by switching agricultural systems would negatively affect others.  Agricultural responses to this salinity problem will influence current and long-term adaptability of the systems to future changes in salinity intrusion and  other  social-ecological  developments  in the deltas.  Improving  resilience components, e.g., through  policies and  interventions, resource allocation, and farming system changes, to sustain agricultural production or facilitate transformation to alternative  systems when necessary is critically important for agricultural systems facing stress. Complementing subjective resilience assessments with qualitative  data is thus crucial for understanding the drivers of resilience to improve components of resilience for agricultural systems in the respective deltas.

Các bài báo khác
Số tạp chí 17(2019) Trang: 1-8
Tạp chí: EAI Endorsed Transactions on Context-aware Systems and Applications
Số tạp chí 08(2019) Trang: 1-2
Tạp chí: GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS
Số tạp chí 8(2019) Trang: 71-78
Tạp chí: International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
Số tạp chí 12(2019) Trang: 119-123
Tạp chí: International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research
Số tạp chí Special Issue APE2019(2019) Trang: 104 - 108
Tạp chí: Journal of Vietnamese Environment
Số tạp chí 4(2019) Trang: 72 - 85
Tạp chí: International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business
Số tạp chí 04 (10)(2019) Trang: 6434-6448
Tạp chí: International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research
Số tạp chí 03 (2)(2019) Trang: 64-74
Tạp chí: International Journal of Scientific and Education Research
Số tạp chí 10(2019) Trang: 2521
Tạp chí: Frontiers in Immunology
Số tạp chí 5 Issue: 11(2019) Trang: 15-23
Tạp chí: International Journal of Innovative Studies in Sciences and Engineering Technology (IJISSET)
Số tạp chí VOL. 36, NO. 1,(2019) Trang: 106–126
Tạp chí: International Journal of Water Resources Development


Vietnamese | English






 
 
Vui lòng chờ...